Artículo Original 69 Evaluaci ón r ápi da “in situ” de pu nci ón por e ndoso nograf ía de lesio nes pa ncre áticas - J. I. V argas D . et al. 8.- Iglesias-García J, Lariño-Noia J, Abdulkader I, Domínguez-Muñoz JE. Rapid on-site evaluation of endoscopicultrasound guided fine-needle aspiration diagnosis of pancreatic masses. World J Gastroenterol 2014; 20: 9451-7. 9.- Virk RK, Gamez R, Mehrotra S, Atieh M, Barkan GA, Wojcik EM, et al. Variation of cytopathologists’ use of the indeterminate diagnostic categories “atypical” and “suspicious for malignancy” in the cytologic diagnosis of solid pancreatic lesions on endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspirates. Diagn Cytopathol 2017; 45 (1): 3-13. 10.- Felix K, Hauck O, Schnölzer M, Kempf T, Warnken U, Schneider K, et al. Identification of novel serum autoantibodies for differential diagnosis of autoimmune pancreatitis and pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Pancreas 2016; 45: 1309-19. 11.- Khalid A, Dewitt J, Ohori NP, Chen JH, Fasanella KE, Sanders, et al. EUS-FNA mutational analysis in differentiating autoimmune pancreatitis and pancreatic cancer. Pancreatology 2011; 11: 482-6. 12.- Lee WJ. Endoscopic ultrasound elastography for pancreatic cancer diagnosis: a step forward? Clin Endosc 2013; 46: 116-7. 13.- Bang JY, Hawes R, Varadarajulu S. A meta-analysis comparing ProCore and standard fine-needle aspiration needles for endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition. Endoscopy 2016; 48: 339-49. 14.- Wani S, Mullady D, Early DS, Rastogi A, Collins B, Wang JF, et al. The clinical impact of immediate on-site cytopathology evaluation during endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration of pancreatic masses: a prospective multicenter randomized controlled trial. Am J Gastroenterol 2015; 110: 1429-39. 15.- Schmidt RL, Witt BL, Matynia AP, Barraza G, Layfield LJ, Adler DG. Rapid on-site evaluation increases endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration adequacy for pancreatic lesions. Dig Dis Sci 2013; 58: 872-82. 16.- Klapman JB, Logrono R, Dye CE, Waxman I. Clinical impact of onsite cytopathology interpretation on endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration. Am J Gastroenterol 2003; 98: 1289-94. 17.- Alsohaibani F, Girgis S, Sandha GS. Does onsite cytotechnology evaluation improve the accuracy of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy? Can J Gastroenterol 2009; 23: 26-30. 18.- Iglesias-García J, Domínguez-Muñoz JE, Abdulkader I, Larino-Noia J, Eugenyeva E, Lozano-León A, et al. Influence of on-site cytopathology evaluation on the diagnostic accuracy of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) of solid pancreatic masses. Am J Gastroenterol 2011; 106: 1705-10. 19.- Collins BT, Murad FM, Wang JF, Bernadt CT. Rapid on-site evaluation for endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle biopsy of the pancreas decreases the incidence of repeat biopsy procedures. Cancer Cytopathol 2013; 121: 518-24. Gastroenterol. latinoam 2017; Vol 28, Nº 2: 63-69
gastrolat 2 2017
To see the actual publication please follow the link above